Intercontinental Cup

The Supercup was barely alive, but the Intercontinetal Cup was dead. In the coffin. Until the Japanese stepped in, bringing it back to life. The new project was renamed the Toyota Cup, although nobody really used the new name. The intercontinental challenge was to be played in Tokyo and international football bodies helped by making participation mandatory – whoever declined was facing harsh legal consequences. The new format was approached cautiously – the new format was financially stable, thanks to Toyota’s money, but it was far away from home. For his part, the Japanese clearly wanted to popularize the sport at home and what could be better than a match between the top clubs of the top continents? The Europeans liked that the match was going to be on neutral ground. The main problem currently was the timing – the first Toyota Cup was played on February 11th, 1981. It was the 1980 issue of the tournament, though – the discrepancy had to be worked out and also the form of the opponents was to be a problem, for Europeans were just at the end of their winter break and the South Americans – between seasons yet. But there was no other convenient window in the year. Playing football in February was hardly the best idea, but 62 000 attended the match between Nottingham Forest and Nacional (Montevideo).

The greatest part of the crowd was Japanese, which created strange atmosphere: both teams were equally cheered by benevolent, yet, largely ignorant of football crowd. Winter football was generally benefiting the English, who played without winter break anyway. The South Americans saw themselves in disadvantage, but on the other hand the pitch was not exactly up to European standards and more familiar to the Uruguayans. May be so… both goalkeepers played with long trousers, instead of shorts,which was very unusual. The match itself was not so great – at first Nacional attacked and scored in the 10th minute.

Waldemar Victorino scores an early goal. Looks like a header – something rare against English defense, if it was indeed a header.

Nottingham Forest got control after the goal and attacked to the end of the final. Fruitlessly…

Seemingly the better team, Nottingham Forest lost 0-1.

 

Tokyo. Field: National Stadium.

February 11, 1981. Att: 62,000.

 

Nacional (Uruguay) 1-0 Nottingham Forest (England)

 

1-0 10′ Waldemar Victorino.

 

Nacional:Rodolfo Rodríguez – Blanco, Hermes Moreira, Enríquez,González, Milar, Espárrago, Luzardo, Alberto Bica,Waldemar Victorino, Morales.

Coach: Juan Mugica.

 

Nottingham Forest: Peter Shilton – Anderson, Lloyd, Burns, F. Gray, O’Neill, Ponte, S. Gray, Robertson, Trevor Francis, Wallace.

Coach: Brian Clough.

After losing the Supercup, Nottingham Forest lost a second international trophy. Not by much, but they lost. Standing from left: Viv Anderson, Martin O’Neill, Larry Lloyd, Kenny Burns, Peter Shilton, Trevor Francis.

First row: John Robertson, Ian Wallace, Frank Gray, Stuart Gray, Raimondo Ponte.

The development of the team was going at the wrong direction somewhat – the grizzled veterans were better than the younger players. Nottingham was already going downhill and the excuse that they won everything already and became disinterested, for there was nothing really exciting to win anymore rings hollow: the team was just not great.

Nacional won the first Toyota Cup, which was great for moral – the 1970s were dreadful for Uruguayan football, but the horror decade seemingly ended and the 1980s started successfully. Also, once again the South Americans bested the Europeans and this time there was no excuse that the losers were actually the second-best European team, as it was for the most of the 1970s. This Nacional vintage was strong indeed, but hardly great squad. There were some old, almost forgotten stars by 1981, associated with the dreadful decade: Esparrago (now 37 years old!), and Milar (29 years old), both part of the last team Uruguay had at World Cup finals. For both players 1980-81 was great restoration of pride after losing face at the 1974 World Cup. The same goes for another player, who did not play at the 1974 World Cup, but still was one of the strong players from the ‘lost’ decade: Juan Carlos Blanco (35 years old). For him, it was second Intercontinental Cup – the first he won in 1972, with Nacional, but against the losing European finalist Panathinaikos (Athens). A few others were new, rapidly rising stars – the future of Uruguayan football: Rodolfo Rodriguez and Waldemar Victorino. Hugo De Leon missed the final, unfortunately. Nacional was on the top of the world almost ten years after they were at the same place.

Nacional proudly displays  the Toyota Cup in Tokyo.

Apart the winners, the greatest thing about the 1980 Intercontinental Cup was its revival. Thanks, Japan!

The Supercup

The Supercup never endeared neither the football fans,nor the clubs. It was played almost half an year after the participants won their trophies – it was already the middle of the next season and everything was different: squads, form, priorities. The continental clubs were just coming to the winter break and looking for some rest. In England, December is traditionally the busiest and possibly the most important month of the season. In the winter fans were not eager to go to the stadiums. But the Supercup was played anyway. Nottingham Forest vs Valencia.

On November 25th, the first leg was played at City Ground. The hosts won 2-1 after little known Argentine, Dario Felman, opened for Valenica in the 47th minute. Ian Bowyer equalized 10 minutes later and scored the winning goal just before the final whistle – in the 89th minute. 2-1 Nottingham. Not much of an advantage, but the minimalistic approach of Brian Clough did not require big margin.

Peter Ward runs away from Spanish defenders. Alas, he was replaced. Also replaced was Dario Felman.

November 25th, City Ground.

0-1 Dario Felman 47th

1-1 Ian Bowyer 57th

2-1 Ian Bowyer 89th

Nottingham Forest: Shilton, Anderson, Gray, McGovern, Lloyd, Burns, Bowyer, Ward (Ponte), Mills, Wallace, Robertson.

Valencia: Pereira, Arias, Castellanos, Solsona, Subirats, Morena, Carrete, Botubot, Cervero, Saura, Felman (Jimenez).

 

The second leg had Valencia more active and eventually the great Uruguayan scorer Fernando Morena hit the net in the 51st minute. Nothing else happened to the end.

December 17th, Estadio Luis Casanova

1-0 Fernando Morena 51st

Valencia: Sempere, Arias, Tendillo, Castellanos, Solsona, Subirats, Kempes, Morena, Botubot, Cervero, Saura.

Nottingham Forest: Shilton, Anderson, Gunn, McGovern, Lloyd, Burns, O’Neill, Ponte, Francis, Wallace, Walsh.

That was that: Valencia won, thanks to away goals rule – the only time in the history of the tournament it was won that way. There was little else to tell: for one or another reason, the greatest stars of both teams did not play both matches: Kempes, Tendillo, Francis. Nottingham was half made of Scots – 6 of them participated: Gray, McGovern, Burns, Wallace, Robertson, and Walsh). There was also the odd sensation – the English were reluctant to buy foreigners and were biased against them, but as if to make a point, Brian Clough got a Swiss in the summer – Raimondo Ponte. Since Swiss players were not hot property at that time, the transfer was and remains strange. Valencia, not to be outdone, fielded 4 foreigners – two Argentines (Kempes and Felman), one Uruguayan (Morena), and one Paraguayan (Jimenez). Who was ‘true’ import and who was ‘oriundo’ was the usual Spanish mystery. That is about everything about the final.

Losers this time – clearly Nottingham Forest were not building a dynasty.

Happy winners. Like Nottingham, Valencia did not appear to improve and build on their success: it was a team with some unaddressed deficiencies. Troubles with Mario Kempes were starting. Fernando Morena made his mark by scoring the so important winning goal, but as whole his European career was unmemorable.

European Champions Cup

The European Champions Cup was similar to the other continental tournaments this season – there were no hard draws and therefore few upsets. Perhaps the only real surprise happened in the first round, when Liverpool was eliminated by Dinamo (Tbilisi). Liverpool won at home 2-1, which looked like temporary carelessness, but in Tbilisi practically destroyed arguably the best team at the time – 3-0. The outcome appeared strange, but let’s face it: Dinamo (Tbilisi) had great team at its peak. The other surprise was FC Porto – they eliminated AC Milan in the first round after 0-0 in Porto and away victory 1-0 in Milano. 1979-80 international season was perhaps the lowest point Italian football reached in the 1970s: only Juventus managed to reach the semi-finals and even they were shaky on the way. On the other hand, FC Porto was beginning its own ascent, eventually becoming one of the leading European clubs by mid-80s. The last note on the start of the tournament was political: the second leg of the preliminary draw between Dundalk (Republic of Ireland) and Linfield (Northern Ireland) was played in Haarlem (Holland). Because of the struggle between IRA and British armed forces, Northern Ireland was banned from hosting international marches – terrorism was the reason.

Nothing unusual happened in the second round: Dinamo (Tbilisi) lost to Hamburger SV both legs – 1-3 and 2-3. FC Porto lost to Real Madrid because of away goal – 1-0 and 1-2. At the ¼ finals there was no way preventing bigger clashes, but there was only one – Celtic vs Real Madrid. Celtic won at home 2-0, then lost in Madrid 0-3 and Real went ahead. Hard to be sorry for the Scots: objectively, Real were the stronger team at the moment. Thus, no surprises once again – Hajduk (Split) tried hard, but at the end lost to Hamburger SV, however, minimally: the Germans won 1-0 at home and lost 2-3 in Split, but qualified thanks to their away goals.

The draw for the ½ benefited Nottingham Forest. Real Madrid and Hamburger SV were paired together and Ajax was left for Nottingham. On the surface, it was not an easy confrontation: it looked like Ajax was coming back. They were the highest scoring team so far – all together, they put the ball in the net 30 times, winning 8-1 twice, 10-0 once, and 4-0 once. Wishful thinking… so far, Ajax had the easiest possible opponents: HJK Helsinki in the first round, then Omonia (Cyprus) in the second round, and RC Strasbourg in the third round. No wonder the Dutch scored so many goals and sailed easily ahead. So easily, they practically did not play the second leg against Omonia – after winning 10-0 at home, the away match was not important at all and Ajax lost it 0-4. It was telling loss – the great Ajax of the early 70s did not allow such losses: even when they played leisurely, they were still far stronger than the opposition, especially such weak one as Omonia. Yet, even if the new Ajax was not equal to the old one, ambition was driving motivator and they tried to reach the final. Nottingham got 2-0 advantage at home, Ajax pushed at the second leg, but Nottingham’s defense allowed only one goal. Close, but Nottingham were the final winners.

Moments from the opening match in Nottingham: Ajax in unusual colours, looking rather ordinary. In the great years, it was the opposition looking helpless and left left behind. Now it was Ajax.

Ajax fought, yet… what a difference: Ruud Krol, the last of the great flying Dutchmen still playing for Ajax, just struggles at the far left. In the memorable past he was soaring high, dominating the game. Times changed.

The other semi-final repeated the first leg of Nottingham-Ajax: at home, Real Madrid won 2-0. Looked like strong advantage and since the final was to be played at Bernabeu Stadium, Real was seen not only as finalist, but as Cup winner. The Germans had different idea and they mercilessly destroyed Real in Hamburg 5-1. Desire, ambition, tradition, grit – nothing helped and Real bowed down to reality: German football ruled.

Nottingham Forest vs Hamburger SV. Exciting final – current Cup holders vs bright ambitious team. West Germans vs English – the leading forces in club football. A plethora of top international players, with Kevin Keegan on top of the list. The Englsih best player against… well, a bunch of Scots and Irish? Something like that, but incredibly intriguing. Trevor Francis missed the final. Horst Hrubesch was on the bench.

 

Final, Bernabeu Stadium, Madrid, 28 May 1980, att 50000

 

Nottingham Forest (1) 1 Hamburger SV (0) 0

21′ 1-0 N: Robertson

 

Nottingham Forest (trainer Clough)

Shilton; Anderson, Gray (Gunn), Lloyd, Burns, Clark; O’Neill, McGovern, Bowyer, Mills (O’Hare), Robertson; Birtles

Hamburger SV (trainer Zebec)

Kargus; Kaltz, Nogly, Buljan, Jakobs; Hieronymus (Hrubesch), Magath, Memering; Keegan, Reimann, Milewski

Referee: Da Silva Garrido (Portugal)

The final was mor exciting on paper than of the pitch – the battle was hard fought, but it was mostly a battle. The Germans never shied away from a clash, and Nottingham was different from was expected from English team: Brian Clough, well aware of the limitations of his squad, preferred tied, defensive tactics. Without Trevor Francis, his attacking options were fewer anyway and the tactical difference was clear: Branko Zebec used the typical scheme of the time – 4-3-3. Clough used seemingly outdated Italian scheme – 5-4-1. Gary Birtles was the lone striker – facing defensive line, lead by Kaltz and Buljan. Rapidly rising to international fame Magath lead the German midfield, which looked superior to Nottingham’s, and finally the German strikers, lead by Keegan, seemed much better than the Nottingham’s defenders. At a glance, Nottingham had only stronger goalkeeper. On the pitch, nobody really prevailed – the final was very exciting to watch, but Clough’s players delivered what they were asked to do and eventually scored a goal in the 21st minute. The only goal of the match.

Ivan Buljan unquestionably dominates Gary Birtles.

Kevin Keegan effortlessly wins the battle with bigger English defender. The pictures tells about German superiority… But Nottingham scored and Hamburger SV did not and Nottingham Forest won their second Champions Cup in a row.

Happy winners indeed. Standing from left: Martin O’Neill, Ian Bowyer, Viv Anderson, John Robertson, Gary Mills, Kenny Burns.

Crouching: Frank Gray, Peter Shilton, John McGovern, Garry Birtles, Larry Lloyd, Brinley Gunn.

John O’Hare is missing. And Brian Clough.

Hamburger SV at the beginning of the final: form left – Keegan, Milewski, Memering, Reimann, Hieronymus, Nogly, Buljan, Jakobs, Kaltz, Kargus, Magath. Almost there, close to the top, but unable to conquer it yet. Still a little bit missing to become truly great team. It was a shame Hamburger SV was unable to shine with Kevin Keegan – but may be that was the reason: so far the make-up of HSV was forced: a cluster of veterans, who achieved almost nothing in their best years (Memering, Reimann, Nogly), one German superstar (Kaltz), two imported players, perhaps slightly beyond their peak (Keegan and Buljan), a strong, but hardly the best German keeper of the time (Kargus), rapidly becoming the top German midfielder of the period (Magath), and few up and coming players, who were primarily supporting players (Jakobs, Hieronymus, Milewski). Horst Hrubesch on the bench. Hrubesch and Magath truly established themselves a bit later, after the final – at the European championship. So far, the idea was seemingly to built a strong squad, bringing stars from abroad – it worked to a point: Hamburger SV was strong, but not peaking yet. It still needed a few adjustments to become a great squad. It was not here time yet – and lost the final.

Nottingham Forest, arguably, at its best. Twice European champions already, winners of every trophy in the last two years. A legendary club already? Nottingham is perhaps the strangest winner – nobody denies the genius of Brian Clough. Nobody can say anything against players like Francis, Shilton, Anderson, Birtles. Yet, Nottingham remains a mythical club largely because they were the underdogs and not a great team. Certainly not great to watch – the least exciting of all English teams playing European finals. Even un-English, with its defensive tactics and generally boring kind of playing. And again – the make-up: Clough favoured second-raters and as great as it was to see ‘discarded’ players conquering Europe (O’Hare, Lloyd, Robertson, Burns), it was unconvincing squad, for it was impossible to see it getting better – rather, it was an accidentally winning team. True, Clough tried hard to elevate the quality, by signing classy stars like Shilton and Francis, but in the same time he was signing questionable for one or another reason players like Stan Bowles and Charlie George. He easily sold Tony Woodcock – but this was understandable, since the strikers at hand were quite similar. One thing was painfully clear already – Nottingham Forest was not going to become a dynasty. It looked largely a group of individual names, but not a real great team: motivation was going to work for a little while perhaps, but Clough’s unorthodox concepts prevented building of long-lasting and memorable team. The great days were rapidly coming to end… untypical team ended untypically: as Clough said later, the boys were no longer motivated after winning everything. There was nothing more to win, nothing more to prove… and started to lose. Boredom. Disinterest. Sounds intriguing – and nothing else. A great short run of ugly ducks. The only endearing thing about Nottingham is perhaps one more look at the names – practically everybody won their international trophies during this two years. Players, beyond their peak (O’Hare, Lloyd), middle of the road players (Robertson, Burns), mercurial talents, who failed to reach true success (Bowles, George, Bowyer), great stars, who just played most of the time for clubs in rougher shape and thus unable to win trophies (Francis, Shilton, Birtles, Anderson, Woodcock). It was good to see them win – especially those, who would never win again… the trophy-less superstars. Nottingham Forest – the strangest European conquerors of them all. Back in 1980 it was very possible they were going to win more cups: so unlikely winners they were that everything was possible. They were not fun to watch, though… welcome to the 1980s.

 

Cup Winners Cup

Cup Winners Cup – no surprises here. The closest to upset was the second-round match between Juventus and Beroe (Stara Zagora). The modest Bulgarians won their home leg 1-0 and bravely fought in Turin – the regular time ended 1-0 Juventus and the Italians managed to prevail only in the extra time, when they score two more goals. All other matches finished as expected and even fate did not interfere: the only matches between potential favourites involved Glasgow Rangers. In the 1/16 finals they eliminated Fortuna (Dusseldorf) 2-1 and 0-0, and in the 1/8 finals the Scots were eliminated by Valencia 1-1 and 3-1. They lost at home, interestingly enough. Fortuna (Dusseldorf) was the only West German eliminated so early in a tournament this year. Given the general weakness of the Cup Winners Cup for years, the best was the few stronger teams to reach the final stages and they did: the ½ finals opposed Arsenal to Juventus and Nantes to Valencia. The last strong club eliminated was Barcelona – in the ¼ finals the current holders of the Cup faced Valencia and lost both legs 0-1 and 3-4. Valencia, so far having most difficult opponents, now played against the arguably weakest semi-finalist. Nantes won at home 2-1 and lost 0-4 away – Valencia went to the final. Meantime Juventus managed a 1-1 draw in London and looked like the Italians were going to the final. But Arsenal pull themselves together and won the second leg in hostile Turin 1-0. Arsenal and Valencia at the final. So far Arsenal was perfect – they did not lose a match at all. Valencia had lost one match – against Nantes, but had met stronger opponents on the road to the final than Arsenal. To a point, an interesting and even welcome final: more or less, between the 3rd clubs in England and Spain. Both eager to win and thus increase their reputation, for neither club was happy trailing Real, Barcelona, Liverpool, and Nottingham Forest. The final was going to be tough one between equals, yet, Arsenal was seen as having bit of an edge, lead by Irish bunch – Liam Brady, Pat Jennings, Frank Stapleton, and David O’Leary. Valencia largely depended on two world champions – Mario Kempes (1978) and Rainer Bonhof (1974). Perhaps Arsenal was preferred because the English always played open attacking football. Valencia was expected to play slower unattractive game, boring to the viewers. Aesthetically, Arsenal was preferred.

Final, Heysel Stadium, Brussels, 14 May 1980, att 36000

 

Valencia (0) 0 Arsenal (0) 0 aet

Valencia won 5-4 on penalties

 

Valencia

Perreira; Carrette, Botubot, Arias, Tendillo; Solsona, Saura, Bonhof, Subirates (Castellanos); Kempes, Pablo

Arsenal

Jennings; Rice, Nelson, O’Leary, Young; Rix, Talbot, Price (Hollins), Brady; Sunderland, Stapleton

Mario Kempes vs Arsenal

Predictions and expectations were fulfilled – the final was tough, Arsenal was the better team, Valencia played ugly football, but the English, as many times before, were unable to covert their superiority into victory.

Liam Brady vs Bonhof.

The most impressive player on the field was Rix, relatively unknown English, who plowed relentlessly on the left wing, yet, fruitlessly. The match ended 0-0, the extra time ended 0-0, and after 120 minutes of grinding football Valencia achieved its goal: a fair chance to win the cup not by playing football, but by lottery of penalty shoot-out. And perhaps they had some advantage at last, because English teams were not famous for their penalties. The shoot-out proceeded dramatically until at last and English player missed and Valencia won 5-4.

Perreira and Jennings – everything was in their hands. Goalkeepers always are considered the key to winning or losing a shoot-out – but the kickers really decide the outcome. May be not?

The Spaniards scored one after another. Jennings failed to deflect… who was the hero?

Graham Rix missed his penalty. Perreira saved. The hero was…? Valencia won by chance, no matter what. Happiness erupted. Once again the Cup Winners Cup was going to Spain.

Arsenal lost the Cup Winners Cup without actually losing a match – there was a sense of injustice in it, especially because they were the better team at the final, but nothing like the indignation following the losses of Leeds United to Milan and Bayern earlier in the 1970s. Arsenal was not robbed of victory, like Leeds, but fell victim of its own inability so score. Graham Rix was perhaps the symbol of it – the best player of the final, he missed when mattered most. Just a little, but fatal inadequacy – and could yoy really blame him? Everyone could make a mistake in the Russian roulette of a shoot-out… but on a second thought if one does not score when it matters most, then he is not really great. And that was the problem of Arsenal – seemingly, the better finalist: Jennings, Stapleton, O’Leary, and Brady provided strong backbone of current stars, around which there was strong assembly of experienced veterans, current leading Englsih players, and promising youngsters: Nelson, Rice, Hollins, Talbot, Sunderland, MacDonald, Rix. As a whole, richer and better balanced side than Valencia’s. Yet, good. But not great – already the true measurement of greatness was international success and here Arsenal failed. It was strong and appreciated team, but… missing little something. It was a team for domestic consumption really and remained so. Nothing like Liverpool of the same time.

Winners are not to be criticized for victory is unbeatable argument, but Valencia had seemingly lesser squad than Arsenal. Apart from the two superstars Kempes and Bonhof, the rest was rather unremarkable – Tendillo, Solsona, and Saura were the internationally known players and the rest of the team was more or less middle of the road. Of course, having the world’s player of the year 1978, captaining Argentina to her first world title, should have made the difference. Especially when Mario Kempes had the 1974 world champion Rainer Bonhof behind him… but it was rather typical anda bit outdated make: two outstanding players, aided by workhorses. It was not enough for overcoming a well balanced opponent: Kempes and Bonhof did not shine at the final. Gritty Spanish style carried Valencia to the shoot-out and they were lucky to win at this arbitrary stage. But those were strong years of Valencia and the end of the decade repeated the beginning of it, when they won the Spanish title. The European victory was more a matter of luck than anything, yet it was good to see player like Kempes winning trophies on club level at last. However, like Arsenal, Valencia was second-best. Good as they were, Valencia was not really challenging the domination of Real and Barcelona in Spain, let alone building a dynasty. It was not a memorable winner and was not innovative team. No matter – the record stands clear: Arsenal lost, Valencia won. Tell the fans their team did not deserve the Cup Winners Cup…